maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Brainstorm (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=47)
-   -   [Under consideration] Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=33257)

Texrat 2009-10-21 15:38

[Under consideration] Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk
 
Quote:

We have Karma already for receiving thanks for posts in Talk, but I believe it should be the other way around as well. People should be credited for thanking (ie, encouraging others).
http://maemo.org/community/brainstor...hanks_in_talk/

allnameswereout 2009-10-21 16:00

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
Writing a good post worth a Thanks! costs more effort than thanking someone for a post. I assume you don't surf the forum to search for posts to Thanks!, but that you stumble upon them and respond by thanking.

There has to be a mechanism so that little johnny can't t(h)ank 1000 random posts to karma whore and screw the worthiness of the Thanks shown & search feature. I suggest, only let one thanking count to karma if there is an equal Thanks! given to the thanking user. So if you Thanks! and make good posts you eventually receive karma from both Thanks! as well as thanking others. This creates a healthy synergy between the 2 IMO.

Texrat 2009-10-21 16:29

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
I agree with what you say in your first paragraph, which is why I proposed a fractional metric. And I don't see that giving/getting thanks balances out necessarily. Anyway, the proposal may have no merit after all, which is what the Thumbs Down is for. ;)

Jaffa 2009-10-21 16:56

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
No, I think giving "Thanks!" is an action which shows some participation in the community but is of such little value, and so easy to do, that it's effectively worthless.

zerojay 2009-10-21 16:58

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
It's not a bad idea but what's to stop someone from thanking every single last post? Maybe users should be limited by the number of thanks they can give out in a day so that they actually mean something, much like Bugzilla votes.

...now where's that handy FINISH HIM! button gone to? ;)

Texrat 2009-10-21 18:55

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
What stops abuse NOW? ;)

f(x) 2009-10-21 21:18

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
It is a bad idea.

Giving "Thanks" shouldn't have any influence on karma.
If everything you do is going to be ranked then this forum will be turned into some kind of childish game.
Making an indicator of "Healthy account" and link it with giving thanks might be a good idea. (Many people don't like to post, but giving thanks will reflect a good healthy account in their profile[in future there might be a use for this])


Just think of this:
@Texrat ,zerojay and others: Wanna swap "Thanks"? (We all are going to get double Karma)

For those who are interested, you can easily pm me. ;)


Anyway, this might be the worst example to give however, if someone is going to suggest an idea to rank a bad post (Some thing that shows how ungrateful or being thankless). You will get my vote for it (This will get me to change my signature into something more useful). ;]

Texrat 2009-10-21 21:21

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
FYI, disagreement is fine, but do you have to label an idea as "bad"?

Anyway, as I seem to keep having to mention over and over again, everything is subject to abuse. The potential of abuse is not enough to discredit an idea. If it were, we'd still be planting crops with sticks and harvesting by hand. ;)

zerojay 2009-10-21 21:26

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 354594)
FYI, disagreement is fine, but do you have to label an idea as "bad"?

Anyway, as I seem to keep having to mention over and over again, everything is subject to abuse. The potential of abuse is not enough to discredit an idea. If it were, we'd still be planting crops with sticks and harvesting by hand. ;)

Well, I didn't... I even said so at the start. Just trying to make sure that these kinds of problems are being thought of, that's all. :)

lcuk 2009-10-21 21:27

Re: Brainstorm: Karma for GIVING thanks in Talk (Under consideration)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by texrat (Post 354594)
fyi, disagreement is fine, but do you have to label an idea as "bad"?

Anyway, as i seem to keep having to mention over and over again, everything is subject to abuse. the potential of abuse is not enough to discredit an idea. If it were, we'd still be planting crops with sticks and harvesting by hand. ;)

citizen, put down the stick and step away from the crops.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:16.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8