View Single Post
Posts: 2,225 | Thanked: 3,822 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Florida
#13
Originally Posted by pali View Post
I think it is not good idea to create package which substitute package. Then we will have package which substitute package which substitute package which substitute package...

No Debian system is doing this

And as I wrote I need to fix some code...
Recodes of the other things will come. I have a vested interest in seeing an /sbin/preinit replacement (or licensing change - not that I'm hoping that'll go through) that permits for proper OSS-style redistribution.

As for the other pieces, I honestly don't see what's wrong with packaging open-getbootstate seperately at first, and the making a 'proper' package replacement once all the components are available in properly open form.

Up to you and the CSSU people of course, but I don't think an open replacement of a closed part should be kept from the CSSU, especially when we don't know when or if everything that belonged to the same Nokia stock package will get recoded.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mentalist Traceur For This Useful Post: