View Single Post
Posts: 136 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ @
#475
Originally Posted by philheaton View Post
the original cyan housing my N9 came with was horrible. Ill fitting with a large 1mm gap between the lower part of the screen and the housing. The physical buttons rattled and the whole thing creaked and groaned every time i used it. I swapped the housing out for a white one I bought on ebay for about £40 and it fits like a glove. The white is as brilliant as any lumia ive seen and is a joy to hold.

my Lumia 800 (black, direct from Nokia) has an awful screen that appears to have a seam running right down the middle of it. The light reflects in a horrible way and i was so concerned that i took it to a care point as i thought it might be a weakness that would later cause the screen to crack. The guy said it was fine, so i live with it.

in short, build quality varies so much i dont believe you can put it down to something as simple as "lumias are built better than N9 or vice versa".
Once again, I do not believe that. I said in a thread or a forum that I read(not exactly sure which one) some people said that their lumias were better built than their N9's. Also, in one of my other posts I said that production varies. This is quoting post #464 "I don't think that all were better since there are always errors in production."

Last edited by TheN9er; 2012-11-29 at 21:06.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to TheN9er For This Useful Post: