|
2005-11-10
, 15:05
|
Posts: 108 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Central London
|
#12
|
Looks like MMC Mobile is a little bit faster ...
The other possible test would be to read/write from the cards connected directly to a PC (with a recent card reader) ...
Fred
|
2005-12-01
, 23:16
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Hubbardston, MA, USA
|
#13
|
|
2005-12-02
, 14:48
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#14
|
|
2005-12-02
, 15:04
|
Posts: 95 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Sep 2005
|
#15
|
|
2005-12-02
, 15:27
|
Posts: 34 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Germany
|
#16
|
Conclusions: since the default card (since it has all the pins) has the potential to have the highests speed, assuming that the B for transfer rates means "bit" and looking at the measured times (range 10 to 30 seconds): My conclusion is that we're on the slow side . Which means that buying MMCmobile is not necessary for the 770. But DV (as opposed to single-voltage) is necessary.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
2005-12-02
, 15:31
|
|
Posts: 772 |
Thanked: 183 times |
Joined on Jul 2005
@ Montclair, NJ (NYC suburbs)
|
#17
|
|
2005-12-02
, 16:00
|
|
Posts: 148 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Stimutax, AZ
|
#18
|
On the 64MByte card provided with the 770, there is the second row of contacts, thus this memory card appear to be a MMC mobile card.
I guess the second row of contacts is for DV cards only. While the 64MB Nokia card has two rows my 1GB RS-MMC SanDisk has only one and is single voltage. Both cards work perfectly in the 770 thus DV is not necessary.
|
2005-12-02
, 16:35
|
Posts: 28 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Hubbardston, MA, USA
|
#19
|
|
2005-12-02
, 18:39
|
Posts: 51 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ Midlands, UK
|
#20
|
But DV (as opposed to single-voltage) is necessary.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
The other possible test would be to read/write from the cards connected directly to a PC (with a recent card reader) ...
Fred