Originally Posted by HtheB

Well, I nominate Dave999

Originally Posted by Win7Mac

Again, I am very sorry if I hurt anybodys feeling by not nominating or putting anybody in the row of my 'mentionees'.
But you know, thankfully I'm not the one to decide who's valid and dignified...


Did you realize this was probably your first post where you were being almost straight objective? - Usually you have a strong tendency to pull your readers into your mindset and what to think of your findings.
But now that you mentioned it, where exactly did you confirm your candidacy in your post, which sentence?

And while I agree or thank you for some posts, I personally and generally find your posts tedious to read and hard to grasp what you're trying to say for different reasons and I'm sure I'm not alone since I'm not the only non-native. Here's why:
- Your posts are way too long
- You rarely write complete sentences
- Way too many uhs, ohs and punctuation marks (you know...... what I mean???!!!)
- Way too many slang (U no wad ima talkin'bout, dontcha?)
- You're using many effigies, likenesses, allegories that are only known to natives and insiders of whatever kind (chanooks probably?)
- You're using many and also uncommon adverbs and adjectives (to give your comments a certain tint?)
- It feels like you're always hypothesizing your readers agree 100% (what if they don't)?
- and it sucks if all the above already manifests in your thread titles...

Now that's just me. But I felt it from the point you surfaced here. I always waited for someone else to mention that somewhere but that either didn't happen or I didn't notice. I'm sorry this 'sort of a topic' (which again is my very personal one and shouldn't be yours really) condenses in this thread...

With all that said, rest assured that you are, even in my eyes still, a very dignified candidate. Good will is key for that and I guess it's safe to say you have plenty of that.
You now officially have my vote!

Originally Posted by mosen

I have some issues with the mailadress i registered being recognized as spam...

Originally Posted by pichlo

I do not know what mosen means, but my acceptance email has just bounced:

Code:

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
From 	Mail Delivery SystemAdd contact 	Date 	Today 11:42
<- <<- ->   []

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  maemo-community@maemo.org
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<maemo-community@maemo.org>:
    host mail.maemo.org [213.128.137.23]: 550 5.7.1 <maemo-community@maemo.org>:
    Recipient address rejected: Mail appeared to be SPAM or forged. Ask your Mail/DNS-Administrator to correct HELO and DNS MX settings or to get removed from DNSBLs; MTA helo:
    mailscan1.extendcp.co.uk, MTA hostname: mailscan38.extendcp.co.uk[176.32.230.32] (helo/hostname mismatch)

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
<snip>

An overly aggressive spam filter? It seems to complain about the mismatch between helo and hostname, as if anyone should care.

Originally Posted by reinob

What do you mean exactly?

Originally Posted by reinob

E-mail systems do care about such things. The HELO address should resolve the same IP the MTA is connecting with. I assume you don't own extendcp.co.uk, but it doesn't seem to be doing the right thing.