|
2006-02-10
, 13:27
|
Posts: 477 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Munich, Germany
|
#2
|
|
2006-02-10
, 19:05
|
Posts: 2,152 |
Thanked: 1,490 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ Czech Republic
|
#3
|
|
2006-02-10
, 20:29
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Devon, UK
|
#4
|
|
2006-02-11
, 12:45
|
Posts: 477 |
Thanked: 118 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Munich, Germany
|
#5
|
|
2006-02-11
, 13:10
|
Posts: 78 |
Thanked: 9 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
@ Devon, UK
|
#6
|
|
2006-02-13
, 05:12
|
Posts: 79 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Nov 2005
|
#7
|
My personal reason for wanting Java would be for faster development, at least for prototypes.
As we all know with Java developer can write and test code using the tools they already have on Windows, Linux, Mac, whatever, and simply copy the classes/jar file to the 770 and run.
|
2006-02-13
, 05:59
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2006
|
#8
|
... presumably, we should be able to get some kick-*** JVM performance on the Nokia 770 (relatively speaking).
I was poking around and noticed this in /proc/cpuinfo:
So, presumably, we should be able to get some kick-*** JVM performance on the Nokia 770 (relatively speaking).
I am aware of the "Java dev set" on maemo's ApplicationCatalogWip - how well does jamvm work? Anybody tried any Java GUI apps? I wonder if it takes advantage of the hardware support for Java. What about a browser plugin?