Active Topics
-
Is there a section to talk about Java ME? Apps, etc. (7)
to General by teroyk - 7 hrs, 1 min ago - more...
 |
|
2010-02-03
, 13:04
|
|
Posts: 1,090 |
Thanked: 476 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Ingolstadt, Germany
|
#2
|
cpumem-applet didn't work at all for me.
but you may want to try both of them and decide for yourself which one suits you more
but you may want to try both of them and decide for yourself which one suits you more
 |
|
2010-02-03
, 13:10
|
|
Posts: 4,365 |
Thanked: 2,467 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Australia Mate
|
#3
|
i used to use both, now i have neither, i figure theyd both slow ur device.......
__________________
N9 / N900 Youtube Videos
N9 "Faster, Darker, Better" Theme Pack
---
www.F2thaK.com
N9 / N900 Youtube Videos
N9 "Faster, Darker, Better" Theme Pack
---
www.F2thaK.com
 |
|
2010-02-03
, 14:17
|
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 185 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#4
|
Originally Posted by b666m
Hmm, any info you can share about cpumem-applet not working for you?
cpumem-applet didn't work at all for me.
The cpumem-applet and load-applet regarding to cpu/mem bars at status-area are identical, so they either both work, nor neither works...
So far I've heard 0 reports of cpumem-applet not working.If you find a way to reproduce, file a bug at cpumem-applet at bugs.maemo.org
|
|
2010-02-03
, 14:22
|
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 185 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#5
|
Originally Posted by f2thak
Heh, cpumem-applet is very minimalistic and wastes very very little cpu. It once a second updates its tiny icon, and thats it. I'm not aware of cpumem-applet causing any slowing down, other than making you actually realize when the device is CPU bound (by some other app).
i used to use both, now i have neither, i figure theyd both slow ur device.......
|
|
2010-02-03
, 14:28
|
|
Posts: 1,090 |
Thanked: 476 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Ingolstadt, Germany
|
#6
|
Originally Posted by tuminoid
first i had load-applet installed.
Hmm, any info you can share about cpumem-applet not working for you?[/URL]
wanted to try cpumem, uninstalled load-applet and installed cpumem.
even after some reboots it didn't show up in the status-bar as it should?!
(don't know if it was under PR1.0 or PR1.1... i will try it again and report! maybe it was just some weird thing going on in 1.0 ^^)
edit: works now. no differences for me. it's just the same. (the screenshot and video capture capabilities make no difference in cpu usage at all. just for users who want a lightweight app (regarding the rootfs usage ^^).)
will try the maemo5-load-applet.
Last edited by b666m; 2010-02-03 at 14:37.
|
|
2010-02-03
, 14:28
|
|
Posts: 74 |
Thanked: 63 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
@ Wichita, KS
|
#7
|
Originally Posted by Snaps
Both are the same when come to display cpu and memory usage. The only difference between both apart from displaying usage is the the load applet has a screenshot and video cast feature built in. You'll see the cpumem-applet is the strip down version of the original load applet if you look at the details in application manager
Which is better?
I know load-applet slows down your OS, but does cpumem-applet do the same?
|
|
2010-02-03
, 14:36
|
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 185 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#8
|
Originally Posted by b666m
This sounds like you installed version 0.0.1 from devel which didn't load correctly, but extras-devel stuff by definition is not ready. 0.0.3 (in extras now) passed with flying colors the testing QA and there has not been a need to release newer version as nothing is broken.
first i had load-applet installed.
wanted to try cpumem, uninstalled load-applet and installed cpumem.
even after some reboots it didn't show up in the status-bar as it should?!
(don't know if it was under PR1.0 or PR1.1... i will try it again and report! maybe it was just some weird thing going on in 1.0 ^^)
 |
|
2010-02-03
, 14:36
|
|
Posts: 305 |
Thanked: 71 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ 'Nam
|
#9
|
I perfer load-applet since it has the screen shot and video cast right there. Guess I just perfer to hit a button for a screen shot than doing the keyboard shortcut
|
|
2010-02-03
, 14:41
|
|
Posts: 1,090 |
Thanked: 476 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Ingolstadt, Germany
|
#10
|
Originally Posted by Hotshot
is the video capturing already working?
I perfer load-applet since it has the screen shot and video cast right there. Guess I just perfer to hit a button for a screen shot than doing the keyboard shortcut
I know load-applet slows down your OS, but does cpumem-applet do the same?